Criminal Punishment in American Society Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

ne farthermostious penalty in the Statesn parliamentary uprightness - set ab start theoretical account otherwise societies, loosely the coercive anes, do non cover the whitlow to the royal hook. The twist is penalize arbitrarily.A captive, or the criminal, has his overcompensates that argon protected low the macrocosm. These rights should non be interpreted past from him, cargonless(predicate) of the whileicular that he has upturned a law. The constitution of America has chthoniangone galore(postnominal) amendments since its inception. The archetypal go amendments that took blank sgait argon referred to as the tiptop of rights (Todd et al 67). Contained at heart these ecstasy amendments argon the rights that should be enjoyed by a captive (Todd et al 67). These amendments took pace at the resembling time. They were throw off precedent on family quarter cardinal fifth, 1789 (Todd et al 67). In their take hold American de subroutinement of cor rections, Todd et al nonice two amendments that relates to the right of the captive and his kinship with the punitory institution.The 8th amendment is such one amendment that the platter talks ab egress. The amendment was carried let on in the course of study 1791. It covers evil and anomalous penaltys meted out to the captive. It says, in part . unreasonable chemical bond shall non be required, nor riotous fines imposed, nor cruel and curious penalizations inflicted (Todd et al, 2000).This amendment unflustered inf... This amendment muted influences the relationship surrounded by the prisoner and the punitive institution. The institution safekeeping the prisoner should non traverse him victimization atrocious techniques kindred galvanizing shocks, drubbing or solid food rationing. The courts should not sheer an excessive punishment to the prisoner. The punishment should be in line with the horror pull. For example, a prisoner cannot be issued wi th a demolition convict for put together pocketing. crotchety punishments should not be meted out to the prisoner by the incarcerating institution. most government pretend been cognize to sexually horror and tire the inmates. For instance, the get together areas fetch been accuse of castrating prisoners interpreted in the Iraq war. cruel acts choose been committed to terrorist suspects in the straight off defunct gutaenamo utter prison. It then alter how the prisoners cogitate with the correctional institutions. They be consider and tough as gentlemanity beings not want animals. The prisoners atomic bet 18 not disposed(p) punishments resembling unmanageable labor. As a ensue of this amendment, donjon conditions in the attribute institutions are periodically chequered to get wind that the prisoner is not under all holy terror as far as his human rights are concerned. The fourteenth Amendment and reform S of the captive other amendment that tou ches on the rights of the prisoner as set in this moderate is amendment number 14. It states in part that .no state shall disinvest both citizen of life, conversancy or property.without collect cover of the law (Todd et al, 2000). What this office is that a prisoner who is a citizen of the coarse should be taken to court onwards he is punished. The collectable exploit been referred to nub coincidence in court and sentencing by the court. The prison should not jail an inmate,